Continue the
conversation
from Debtwire.

For the component supply chain, the leverage problem comes second to an industrial continuity problem, and standalone outcomes are now rare. The good news, he said, is that most automotive cases still find an investor — often industrial — willing to execute reshoring and consolidation in partnership with the lenders.

Fashion adds two twists. Palermo pointed to the judicial investigations into supply chains that have forced brands to rebalance margins, and to inventory: his teams regularly find ten-year-old stock still carried at historical cost, "telling a completely different story from the one the consumer sees". Alessandro Ferrari of Generalfinance sees the same crisis cascading upstream to seasonal suppliers who cannot get finance at the right moment, and added wine: consumption is falling, glass costs have risen with energy, and the tightened drink-driving limits cut alcohol sales by close to 30% in their first month, according to one of his distribution clients. His answer for both sectors is aggregation — the small producer can no longer carry fixed costs and foreign distribution alone.

Then the panel argued about causes. Andrea Pescatori of Ver Capital was direct: in his fund's pipeline, energy is not the trigger except in specific sectors such as paper. The dominant cause is growth plans too ambitious for the moment they were written, often out of step with fund lifecycles — and the flow now comes from private-equity-owned companies rather than bank books. Palermo's reading was that a decade of overlapping shocks has shortened horizons: five-year plans are no longer credible, banks lend collectively, and supplier debt is a larger share of the table than a decade ago. Alberto Beretta of Banca CF+ noted that companies got used to funding working capital with guaranteed medium-term debt that no longer exists; his resilient sectors are care homes, project-financed infrastructure and data centres assessed on the end customer's contract.

Giulia Battaglia of Chiomenti turned the lens to the shareholder. A private equity sponsor facing credit funds speaks the same language and, when it will not fund further, hands over the keys with modest edits. A family facing funds can produce what she called nuclear conflict over control — but families also fund businesses for the long term without needing an IRR in three to five years. Alessandro Lanzi of Hogan Lovells Cadwalader found the day's thread in contracts — wrong, imposed, or wrecked by events — and pointed to a Crisis Code power that lets the expert in a negotiated composition ask the parties to renegotiate contracts disrupted by unforeseeable events. Powerful, he said, and almost unused.

The closing round converged on one warning. Palermo and Ferrari both pointed to SACE- and MCC-guaranteed bullet loans reaching maturities in 2027–28 that can no longer be extended — "dust under the carpet", in Palermo's phrase — combined with tax arrears and a rising cost of money. Beretta added that under Basel IV banks no longer hold positions, which argues for court-authorised interim finance of the kind common in the US. Battaglia and Lanzi closed on the second EU insolvency directive, in force from 2029, whose pre-pack provisions may move Italy from a board-centric system towards creditor initiative.

Key takeaways: In Italian automotive components, underwrite the industrial partnership rather than the standalone plan — the panel's experience is that standalone outcomes are now the exception. Test inventory ageing and carrying values as a first-order diligence item in fashion and wine; stock at historical cost is where the panel finds the gap between the balance sheet and the market. Build the 2027–28 guaranteed-bullet maturity into every Italian mid-market credit view now, and check whether the company has replaced guaranteed medium-term debt as its working-capital funding.

The stress they are managing has two sources. The first is the maturity wall of SACE and MCC state-guaranteed loans written between 2020 and 2022, which Ellero called contingent but real — and which complicates every negotiated composition procedure (CNC) because the guaranteed debt ranks as privileged. The second is vintage. Alberto Lampertico of Riello Investimenti said that across loans his funds wrote in 2021–23, around 70% of financial covenants have been breached as industrial plans went in every direction. Zanchi, whose Arcmont tickets run €100–500m, sees the pressure coming less from guarantees than from 2021 pricing and documentation that no longer fit today's conditions.

What distinguishes the fund approach is not aggression. Francesco De Gennaro of Hogan Lovells Cadwalader dismantled that assumption: the private debt fund reads the capital structure as an active investment, so legal work that used to be defensive — what can go wrong — is now offensive — where is the opportunity in the documentation. He described cooperation agreements among lenders arriving in Italian mid-market deals for the first time, and majority–minority mechanics that resolve situations without a court. Marco Sola of Giovanardi Studio Legale listed the toolkit banks rarely use: KPI-linked new money, layered waterfalls, buying out other creditors, debt-to-equity conversion, equity kickers, and monitoring intense enough to justify the higher coupon.

The panel's most repeated point was timing. Zanchi's phrase was that the deal is done at the start — reporting cadence, covenants and governance rights have to be negotiated when the loan is written, because "after eighteen months of a bad year you discover you negotiated semi-annual governance and have no control". Arcmont had an external consultant map its software exposure by sub-segment three years ago; when AI-driven valuation disruption hit this year, the framework already existed. Lampertico's CNC record made the same point from the other end: of three procedures in his portfolios, two failed because the court did not grant protective measures, and the one that is working entered early with lenders aligned.

De Gennaro offered the most practical innovation of the morning. Faced with a "tired" CNC drifting on a recovery thesis the lenders would not back, his team introduced what they called a CNC management protocol: a written agreement between debtor and creditors, before protective measures were supported, fixing three things — the entrepreneur steps back and the board runs the procedure, a Chief Restructuring Officer is appointed with defined powers, and the plan's object is agreed as a sale in continuity. Unioncamere data, he noted, shows the CNCs that succeed are the long ones — over 300 days — and the ones with the most assets and employees. Time is not the enemy. Drift is.

Ellero's caveat closed the loop. Funds can steer governance, insist on a CRO, demand third-party reporting and convert to equity if the underlying business can recover, but they remain lenders — and shadow-director liability keeps them from crossing into management. Moral suasion, she said, is most of the job.

Key takeaways: Negotiate monitoring cadence and step-in rights at origination: for a private credit position, the governance you hold in a downturn is the governance you wrote on day one. In any Italian CNC where a fund holds a meaningful position, put a written protocol in place early — who runs the procedure, who the CRO is, what the plan is for — rather than relying on the expert or the court to create alignment. Treat state-guaranteed debt as a structural feature of Italian capital structures through 2028 and model its privileged ranking before assuming a consensual outcome.

Martina Paiardini of Giovanardi Studio Legale set out what practice has done with it. Conceived as a preventive tool, CNC has become a preparatory one — a voluntary, flexible gateway that many companies now enter in declared insolvency and leave through an extraordinary transaction or a formal restructuring instrument. The incentives: Article 24 lets supplies continue without the threat of clawback; Article 22 allows court-authorised sales of the business; the threshold for extending a restructuring agreement to dissenting creditors has fallen from 75% to 60%; and if the negotiation fails, the simplified concordato is available without a creditor vote. The test throughout is the liquidation comparison — creditors must not be worse off. Her summary of the shift deserves repeating: CNC does not protect rights, it balances interests.

Then came the critique, sharper than the agenda's "growing flexibility" implied. La Marca's target was the new ministerial decree that turns the expert's checklist into a plan-building methodology and makes the whole process traceable. Traceability, he warned, makes the participants feel watched, and the freedom of form CNC started with is the thing worth protecting. His concrete example was the 12-month preclusion: a company cannot re-enter CNC for a year after the previous procedure is archived — even when that procedure succeeded, and even when the creditors want to sit down again. A one-size-fits-all lock-out, he argued, makes no sense in a negotiation, and it is one of several encrustations of the old bankruptcy law still attached to the new tool.

Paiardini's fixes were operational. Banks still suspend credit lines in the window between a CNC filing and the court's confirmation of protective measures, undermining the continuity the procedure exists to preserve. Business sales agreed through a competitive process still wait for a formal instrument to be confirmed before they take effect, partly because the tax authority has been slow to apply the new exemption from joint tax liability on transfers made within CNC. Her answer is speed: binding, deposit-backed offers and a fast close, with the EU pre-pack proposal — sale prepared before the crisis is public, court authorising a process already run — as the model Italy now has to decide how to adopt.

Federico Diomeda, a Genoese commercialista who describes himself as a problem-solver rather than an accountant, took the debate away from the statute book. The remaining constraint is the bank–company relationship. Prudential supervision, he argued, makes Italian banks structurally unable to stay at the table once a client is classified as unlikely to pay; two regulatory directions — save the business, protect the savings — pull in opposite directions. In a bank-centric economy where ten lenders each hold 10% of a company's debt, no lender knows the business well enough to back it. The improvement Italy needs, he said, will not be codified. It comes from each party at a CNC table learning to reason as if the crisis were their own, and from entrepreneurs who stop admiring a company that is already, in his words, "starting to smell".

Key takeaways: Model the CNC timeline explicitly in any Italian special-situations deal, including the gap before protective measures are confirmed and the 12-month lock-out, because both change what a sponsor can promise. If the exit route is a business sale inside CNC, price the interim period between award and transfer and insist on binding, deposit-backed offers — the panel's view is that this is where value is currently leaking. Do not assume the bank syndicate is a partner in continuity once a credit is classified as unlikely to pay; plan for non-bank capital to carry the turnaround.

So where is the stress? Leonardo Adessi of Nextalia gave the answer the room had not heard before. SACE, the state agency that issued Garanzia Italia guarantees to mid-sized and large Italian companies during the pandemic, now holds around €3bn of recourse claims against companies in difficulty. Every one of those claims ranks as super-senior. A creditor that used to be a €1m professional fee at the bottom of the table, he said, is now a €50m state-backed super-priority sitting at the top of it. Mediocredito Centrale, which guaranteed the smaller loans, is the other half of the problem and has not yet taken a structured position. Adessi's view is that the shock of 2020–23 has not reached the restructuring tables yet, and that when it does, it will push resolutions away from consensual bilateral deals towards court-supervised tools — the concordato preventivo and the simplified concordato at the tail of a failed negotiation.

The second shift is procedural. Antonio Tavella of Chiomenti described three trends that now define almost every Italian situation: the composizione negoziata della crisi (the negotiated composition procedure, or CNC) has become the default container for restructurings because it buys the debtor time, leaves management in place and often stays off the companies register; the concordato preventivo has become a residual tool; and the liquidation scenario has become the benchmark for every negotiation. Lisi added the counterweight — CNC is being used by companies with €10–15m of turnover, and only a relatively small share of procedures close positively, with the smaller, less structured companies the most likely to fail.

The third shift is human. Simona Santoro of Iccrea Banca argued that "crisis" is still a stigma, a censure point for banks and a word that hides a phase most companies will now go through more than once. She wants system-level data — a line in the central credit register showing who is financing whom through a turnaround — and bank pricing that rewards companies for investing in planning and control rather than treating it as compliance. Adessi went further: the tables are full of credit managers and short of corporate-finance and industrial skills. Five servicers and an investor argue over the manoeuvre, he said, and few go into the business underneath. His fix is an "evolved" Chief Restructuring Officer who enters management and implements the plan, and creditors with the courage to use governance rights they currently step back from for fear of shadow-director liability.

Lombardo's closing image tied it together. Italy is not facing a dichotomous shock. It is the boiled frog — a slow loss of manufacturing competitiveness against economies playing by different rules, losing a little every day, without the trigger that forces a decisive reaction.

Key takeaways: Map SACE and Mediocredito Centrale exposure in any Italian target before pricing the equity: a super-senior state creditor changes recovery waterfalls and the practical route to a consensual deal. Treat a CNC filing as the start of a process, not a resolution — the panel's experience is that only a minority close positively, and a second, harder restructuring often follows for smaller companies. Put industrial capability at the table early: a plan that only credit managers have reviewed has not been tested where the value actually sits.

The headline number was the revision. UniCredit lifted its 2026 growth forecast for Italy to 0.8% from the 0.5% it pencilled in immediately after the outbreak of the Iran conflict, on the back of a second quarter that beat expectations through private consumption, investment and services. Manufacturing remains the weak spot and Federico expects a further slowdown in the third quarter, but her base case is a gradual recovery from the end of this year into 2027. Her working assumption of 0.2% quarterly growth is, she pointed out, simply the average Italy has delivered since late 2023 — through an energy crisis, a rate shock, tariffs and two wars.

The uncomfortable part is energy. Oil is above $105 a barrel and European gas above €80 per megawatt-hour, levels last seen in the closing months of 2022. Federico's read is that current prices already discount a persistent conflict, so a further leg up would need a severe escalation. But she does not expect pre-conflict energy prices before the end of 2027 or early 2028. That feeds directly into an inflation forecast of 3% for Italy and the euro area this year, up from 1.5% in 2025, with energy inflation swinging from negative in March to roughly +17% in August. Core inflation, she stressed, stays at 2% across 2026 and 2027 and there is no sign of a wage–price spiral — but the European Central Bank is already tightening and UniCredit expects at least one more "insurance" hike to a 2.75% deposit rate by year-end. At that level, she said plainly, policy stops being neutral and becomes mildly restrictive for demand.

For anyone underwriting Italian credit, the sentence that mattered was this: with domestic demand modest, companies cannot pass higher energy costs downstream, so the shock lands in operating margins rather than prices. Growth stays below 1% in the near term for that reason. The offset is structural. Exports passed €600bn in 2025, roughly 30% of GDP, and Italian shipments to the United States held up better than Germany's, Spain's or France's after the April 2025 tariff shock — with pharmaceuticals, advanced machinery and other high-value sectors growing while price-sensitive Made in Italy categories struggle. Fixed investment is back at 20% of GDP, non-residential and infrastructure investment is up 50% since end-2023, and public investment has doubled from 2% of GDP in 2018 to 4%, closing the gap with the rest of Europe.

Federico closed on the fiscal constraint. The government's planned €35bn of defence and energy-security investment in 2027–28, financed through the national escape clause, reverses the deficit-reduction path that was supposed to stabilise Italy's debt in 2027, just as sovereign yields are rising. Her conclusion was that Italy cannot fund its own growth and that the next EU multiannual budget from 2028 — simpler, and built on the disbursement mechanics of the national recovery plan (PNRR) — matters more to Italian corporates than the current debate acknowledges.

Key takeaways: Underwrite Italian industrial credits on the assumption that energy costs compress margins for at least another 12–18 months, because weak domestic demand blocks pass-through. Treat a 2.75% ECB deposit rate as the base case for refinancing and covenant models, and stress-test floating-rate structures against a mildly restrictive stance rather than a neutral one. Separate the portfolio by export exposure: high-value exporters to the US and diversified emerging markets have a growth engine, while energy-intensive and low-tech domestic sectors carry the macro risk.